Leftist politician Brad Sherman (D-CA) has drafted an articles of impeachment based upon false and disproved evidence regarding the fake Russian collusion and interference narrative. As we all know, the Leftist politicians and the many of the Leftists will push for impeachment even though there is no evidence of wrongdoing. As we also know, the Leftists have already lost their narrative regarding Russia, so they want to do something else. The Leftists will never give up, as they seek to obstruct everything.
Recently, the Far Left Media and the Political Left continue to spew the fake news conspiracy theory that Russia was involved in hacking with the 2016 Presidential election to get Trump elected as President. Now, even Democrats admit no evidence exists that Russia colluded or was involve with the meddling of the 2016 elections. Yet, the partisan hacks at CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC still believe that somehow Trump colluded with Russia so that Clinton would lose. There is no evidence of Russians meddling with the voting machines or hacking anything related to the 2016 elections.
The DNC and the RNC are not the governing bodies who are responsible for sponsoring the elections. No, because the parties that are responsible for sponsoring the elections are the individual states and their local municipalities. Even though when presented with evidence that Russia was most likely not involved in messing with the election, the Far Left still says other wise, even though the Russian narrative has been debunked by Obama appointees. Nevertheless, the Far Left still continues with this fake Russian narrative, only because of what Crowd Strike said. Remember folks, the FBI was not allowed to investigate the DNC computers because the DNC was confident it was Russia.
So, where does that leave us, well the DNC emails that ended up on Wikileaks was probably an inside job. Let’s remember there were four types of data and security breaches that could be due to hacking and or leaking of the information.
- Democratic Caucus Leaks
- Democratic National Committee Leaks
- The Podesta Emails
- Clinton Foundation
Now, there is no evidence that Russia was involved in all three of these data breaches, but the Far Left still wants to pin everything on Russia because their candidate lost the 2016 Presidential election to Donald Trump. Yet, when you say Seth Rich could have been involved as a leaker, you will get shut down or censored by the Far Left media and partisan hacks, as they believe Russia was responsible for everything, and they call you a conspiracy theorist. Well, here is something wrong with that: there is no evidence of Russian meddling, collusion, or interference in the 2016 Presidential election but they still keep on pushing it. Even if the Russians tried to interfere it did not work, but now they also blame RT or Russia Today, which is financed by Putin, yet many of the hosts on that channel are liberals who only want to get to the bottom of things. Some of the reporters and contributors even have a Far Left understanding of the constitution. So, in reality, Russia Today and Russia did not really do anything to get Trump elected, but it is well-known they probably hate Clinton, yet if Clinton won the election Putin would have no problem with Clinton being the president. Read Here About Russia Today
And now, that gets us to the main story of how to solve a crime:
- Gather all relevant information
- Interview possible witnesses, persons of interests, and or suspects and confront them with the information and or evidence gathered from phase 1
- Conduct re-enactments if necessary
- Develop theories and or opinions of what might have happened or occurred
- Interview people again and confront them with new information
- Attempt to solve the crime by including all evidence and relevant information, including from suspects, persons of interests, and witnesses, as well as possible theories of what might have occurred and any possible motives
Now, it is that step that involves the development of theories of what might have occurred that gets the Far Left media and partisan hacks angry at when you want to solve the Seth Rich murder. The reason the Political Left gets angry at you and wants to shut you down is because they want to blame Russia and they hate Trump. No evidence exists that Russia got Trump elected, and yet the Political Left still wants to blame Russia. The Russian narrative is an actual conspiracy theory because no evidence exists, but the media and the Political Left wants you to believe that Russia was involved because they want to impeach Trump and because their candidate lost. Without including all relevant theories, you won’t be able to solve a crime.
So, if trying to solve a murder by trying to include all possible and relevant information, including potential or alternative leads is considered a conspiracy theory, then what is the hope and or reason for solving a crime? In order to solve this murder of Seth Rich, we must look at the possibility of Seth Rich being a leaker to Wikileaks. All leads must be explored.
On the night of the ISIS terror attack, just after the Ariana Grande concert ended, CNN and MSNBC revived the fake news Russian collusion narrative. There is and never was any Russian collusion between Trump and his campaign with Russia. Senator Feinstein has even admitted she has seen no evidence, along with anti-American congresswoman Maxine Waters. And yet, Maxine Waters thinks the Kremlin invented the ‘Lock Her Up’ chant. What a bunch of nonsense that the Far Left Propaganda Media keeps on spewing.
Today, deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as the special counsel to lead the “Trump-Russia” investigation. Now, the Democrats and the Far Left think that is collusion, even though none exist; and even more, many of the Democrats and Far Left were happy that a special counsel was appointed, thinking Trump will be impeached. However, the appointment of the special counsel does not mean anything in this case, as it will prove nothing ever happened.
Rosenstein released the following statement about the appointment,
In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter. My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination. What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.
Now, if you look closely at the wording, phrasing, and reasoning behind the appointment, you will see that Rod Rosenstein believes that he must appoint such a special counsel because of public pressure. Even though no collusion and or evidence exists, as Rod Rosenstein probably knows, he knows this story about Russia won’t go away unless a special counsel is appointed. Rod Rosenstein probably knows no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion exists between Trump and Russia, but he still most likely wanted to stop the Fake News spewed by the Democrats and the Far Left. In other words, the appointment of the special counsel was only made to tell the critics of the Trump Administration to stop acting like idiots.